|
Minor Prophets: Major Messages
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Passages From the Writings P&P · “That the church was established only with the Israelitish nation, wherefore evils and falsities will be examined there, vers. 1, 2....” Scripture Confirmations · Verse 2 is quoted verbatim in a Posthumous Theological Work called Scripture Confirmations, but no explanation is given. Derived Doctrine Our work on these verses will require more application than we have done so far. There is one reference in the whole of the Writings, and it gives a summary of the two verses with little regarding specific representations. But this is a wonderful experience, so let’s enjoy it. “Hear this Word that the Lord has Spoken…”
The Lord Speaking to Anyone
The Lord Speaking Against Anyone
“O children of Israel, against the whole family”
Being Brought up out of the Land of Egypt
“You only have I known of all the families of the earth”
Putting It All Together 1. The church was established only with the Israelitish nation. Israel and its scribes, as troublesome as they were, meticulously copied every jot and tittle of the Word. They preserved the Word with a loyalty that is impressive. By the means of their labor, the books of the Word, with amazingly few errors, were passed on through the generations to us. The Lord’s watchful, knowing, and corrective Providence kept the Word so that the New Testament and the Writings might rest upon a firm foundation of the Old Testament. For this to be so, the Lord knew only Israel and their evils and falsities had to be examined there. As we think about this, it is even more amazing to think about the “wholeness” of the Word. Here is a book written for those in the past, and yet it had to be written so as to help those of us in the present. But that is not all. The Word had to feed not only the past and the present, but it had to be the source of inspiration for the angels to study to eternity and be so profound that the angels will never exhaust the myriad of truths in a single word or placement of a comma. Every detail contains meaning: The curvatures in the letters, the Hebrew letters with little horns turning upwards, the vowel sounds adding a roughness or aspiration to the meaning of the Word. So much more could be said about what the angels find in the Word. No human could ever accomplish this astounding feat of writing. Such an awesome preparation of the Word so that our discovery of truth will always be new and exciting reminds us of a passage in Genesis:
2. Some of this amazement carries over into the way the Lord called Swedenborg to be His servant to bring the Writings into the world so as to fulfill the promise of the Second Coming. The Lord is ever watchful of His New Church. We are to be guardians of these Divine works. How are we doing? Do we think of ourselves as the chosen ones? Are we willing to be encouraged or chastised by the Lord? Do we come with a wholeness of family? The whole heart, the whole soul, the whole mind, and all the forces? Total submission to the Lord’s church? In part, the above reflects creative derived doctrine at work. What appeared void of direct teachings opened avenues of thought and application. What do you think of the use of derived doctrine? How does it contribute to our study? Read and Review Read Amos 3:1-2. Read the summary in P&P. Questions to Stimulate Reflection 1. Please write out any questions that have occurred to you during this section and share them with the group during the discussion time. 2. Here is a question I hesitate to offer because it requires knowing the differences in the branches of the New Church organizations, and I don’t want to send you off with a research project to answer this question. What are the varying views of the Writings in each branch of the New Church? Remember the four are: 1. General Convention. 2. Conference. 3. General Church. 4. The Lord’s New Church. Each branch has a different viewpoint of the Writings. I have often wondered how Divine Providence is working with these divergent points of view. 3. How does the role of the New Church compare with that of the Israelitish church? What can we learn from their successes and failures? Are there temptations and strengths inherent in this role that are visible in both the Israelitish church and the New Church? 4. How much did Israel understand their spiritual role as a church? How much do we know? How do we learn more? 5. How do the differences between a spiritual church and a human organization play a part in understanding the spiritual role of a church?
Passages From the Writings P&P · “...that a church and no church cannot exist together, neither truths and falsities together without [the latter] being seized [by the former], vers. 3-6...” AC 9348[5] and earlier sections · “That such things do not come to pass when a man does not love himself and the world above all things, is described in Amos...iii. 4,5. · What things do not come to pass? Earlier in this number, we are told about the signification of a snare: “...a snare when said of evils, as being allurement and deception. That evils allure and deceive, is because all evils spring from the loves of self and of the world...and the loves of self and the world are born with a man, and he feels the delight of his life from the moment of his birth...these loves, like the unseen currents of a river, continually draw the thought and the will of man away from the Lord to self, and away from heaven....” · In this context, the things that do not come to pass are the negative aspects of the correspondences. When we read lion, roaring, prey, den, etc., we are not to focus on allurement and deceptions nor the love of self and the world. Instead, we are to focus on the positive correspondences. AC 592 · “...it is predicated of Jehovah or the Lord that He punishes, that He tempts, that He does evil, that He destroys or kills, and that He curses. As for example...In Amos: - Shall evil befall a city, and Jehovah hath not done it? (iii. 6).” And further in this number we read: “...it is man who brings evil upon himself, and ruins and destroys himself—although it is not man, but evil spirits who excite and lead him...” De Verbo, Section XII, number 284 · “...the Divine operation does not fall into a man who is empty and void, as for example one who does not know that the Lord is pure love and pure mercy, good itself, and truth itself, and that love itself and good itself are such in their essence that they cannot do evil to anyone, neither be angry nor revengeful....that there is no evil in the city which Jehovah hath not done, as in Amos (iii. 6)...” Derived Doctrine Please note that the Lord asks seven questions in these verses. Question One: “Can two walk together, unless they are agreed?” Two
To Walk
The answer to this question seems evident when we consider that a will and understanding working together produce results, or walk toward an agreed upon goal. Good acts and truth receives. Are they agreed? There is no indication that they are pulling against one another; therefore, they must be in some degree of agreement. Question Two: “Will a lion roar in the forest, when he has no prey?” Lion
Roaring
Forest
Prey
Do we have a possible answer to question two? The Lord’s roaring is to indicate how zealously He wants to pull His people from the extreme destruction of the knowledges of the church (religiosity). He, as a lion, wants to awaken within His people the remains hidden in the internal man. This portion of the prophecy is not about doom but hopefulness. The lion in the forest will roar to announce that rescue and deliverance are available for the faithful. His celestial has the power to deliver many from hell. Question Three: “Will a young lion cry out of his den, if he has caught nothing?” A Young Lion
Cry Out of the Lion’s Den
We now have somewhat of a paradox to clear up. We do not have a direct representation of the word “den.” We have “den of thieves or robbers.” We have representations of caves, but almost nothing for a lion’s den. The only reference given is the one where they put Daniel in the lion’s den. In P&P (explaining Daniel 6:10-17, regarding those who proposed worship of themselves instead of the Lord), we read that “...when this decree was opposed by those who belong to the Lord’s church, it was enacted that they should undergo the punishment [pronounced] by the inquisition, which is the lion’s den, into which Daniel was cast.” In the references to “cave” and “lair,” we are taught that they signify the evil of self-love robbing the individual or church of its power and truth. But with several of the references above (AC 6368 and AC 6369), we have the correspondence of old (mature) lion and young lion in a most positive usage. This third question is probably a continuation of Question Two. The old (mature) lion is to teach us about the Lord’s power through love, and the young lion is to teach us about His power through truth from good. Therefore we can’t use den, cave, and lair in the opposite sense of self-love robbing the individual and church. The Lord robs no one. His goal is to set us free. We can, however, see the Lord’s Divine Good and Truth “catching” us and delivering us from the grip of hell. His power of truth from good can snatch us or tear us away from the grip hell imagines it has over us. Therefore, the young lion crying out of his den sounds, to me, like a celebration and announcement to all that His efforts were not in vain, and He is not without His catch. A cry of exultation! Question Four: “Will a bird fall into a snare on the earth, where there is no trap for it?” The literal sense seems to ask us to answer a “dumb” question. If there is no trap on the earth, the bird can’t fall into the snare. Is that really what this question is trying to illustrate? Let’s look at the correspondences. Bird
Snare
A Snare on Earth
The answer then to the Lord’s question is: · If a person’s mind pays attention to the rational things of the church…
...then the bird will not fall into the snare on the earth. The church will exist and will seize or expel the “no church” condition of the mind. Question Five: “Will a snare spring up from the earth, if it has caught nothing at all?” This is a continuation of the question started above. The mind that is given to the Lord doesn’t let allow itself to be snared by negative doubts. Hell would love to prove its point that all the things of the church are useless and ineffective. Hell often seeks to win its battle against the Lord with labels. The church is “narrow-minded.” The church is “behind the times” and doesn’t offer help with current issues. If one opposes the disorder of homosexuality, the opposer is labeled “homophobic.” If an issue is addressed from scripture, it is pointed out that other prohibitions mentioned in scripture are not adhered to. “Be consistent, and don’t choose what you want to expose as disorders. Don’t preach to me!” The snare of earth would love to spring up and expose the mind of the church. The “no church” mind hates the very existence of the Lord’s Church. What I hear in this question is a profound statement from the Lord: The “no churches” think they are clever and able reasoners. Their traps, their trick questions, their lies, their plot to destroy all evidence of the Lord’s truth are like an empty snare on earth with nothing in it. Question Six: “If a trumpet is blown in a city, will not the people be afraid?” Blowing or Sounding a Trumpet
City
Our question seems to be addressed to all of us but most directly to those who reject the Lord. They will be called together on a solemn occasion. They will be examined. Those who have loved the Lord will find it a joyful occasion. Those who have rejected the Lord will find it a time of terror and a sense of “spiritual death.” Question Seven: “If there is calamity in a city, will not the Lord have done it?” Tranquility, Serenity, Moderation
Perspectives
Putting It All Together 1. We must begin with the quote from P&P: “...that a church and no church cannot exist together, neither truths and falsities together without [the latter] being seized [by the former].” 2. The seven questions illustrate this point. The mind that is based on the Lord and His Word will not be empty and void. 3. The Lord will protect; He will seize the believers from the grip of hell. His roar of victory will resound throughout the heavens. Rescue and deliverance will thrill all in the heavens so that they in turn may inspire all on earth. 4. The worldly, the despisers of the Lord and His Word, will not snare the minds of those who believe in the Lord. Those who seek to snare the doctrines of the church are the ones who will be deluded and misled. The “no church” and the “falsity” will be seized by the Lord. Why? Because falsity cannot stand in the presence of the Lord’s truth. Unreality cannot exist in the presence of the Lord’s Reality. 5. Picture Amos speaking this message today. In all probability, he would still be told to get out of town and go back to his sheep. Read and Review Read Amos 3:3-6 Read the summary in P&P. Questions to Stimulate Reflection 1. Did you see a progression in the seven questions and their meanings? 2. What is the significance of the statement of the Lord’s victory over the “no church” state? How does its significance to personal states compare to its significance for religious organizations? 3. Do we take the outcome of the Lord’s work for granted? How does the New Church differ from traditional Christianity in its expectations of the Lord’s work? What is the difference between trustful confidence and self-assured disinterest? 4. How about the Lord’s promise of tranquility and serenity, stemming from the moderate influx of the Divine? What do we think of the word “moderate”? Does it have a positive and negative sense? Which sense seems to be used in this passage? 5. What about the two views of the city? How does a “peephole” view of the city limit the viewer? What might the bricks of the wall represent in this metaphor? How do we get a view from the tower and see generals leading to particulars?
Passages From the Writings P&P · “...that the Lord will most surely reveal this, vers. 7, 8...” AR 3 · “By servants, in the spiritual sense are meant those who are in truths; and because truths are from good, by servants are meant those who are in truths from good, thus also, those who are in wisdom from love.... Now as truths are serviceable to good by teaching it...by servant, in the Word, is meant what is serviceable, or he or that which serves; in this sense not only the prophets are called the servants of God, but also the Lord as to His Human....” Amos 3:7 is cited as an example. AE 409[6] · “Since the Lord in respect to Divine truth is called in the Word ‘a servant’ from serving, so those who are in Divine truth from the Lord and thereby serve others are there called ‘servants,’ as the prophets are....” Amos 3:7 is cited. AE 601[8] · “‘The Lord Jehovah will not do a word unless He hath revealed His secret to His servants the prophets’ signifies that the Lord opens the interior things of the Word and of doctrine to those who are in truths from good; ‘to reveal a secret’ signifies to enlighten and to open the interior things of the Word; ‘His servants the prophets’ signify those who are in truths of doctrine and who receive; ‘ the lion hath roared, who will not fear?’ signifies a powerful revelation and manifestation of Divine truth; ‘the Lord Jehovah hath spoken, who will not prophesy?’ signifies reception and manifestation. The Lord is called ‘Lord Jehovah’ when good is treated of.” Amos 3:7, 8 are cited. AE 624[9] · “In Amos: (iii. 7, 8)...to ‘prophesy’ signifies to receive Divine truth and to teach it....” AR 241 · “...a lion signifies truth in its power...may appear from the power of the lion above every animal of the earth, as also from lions in the spiritual world, where they are images representative of the power of Divine truth.... Hence it is that Jehovah, or the Lord is compared to ‘a lion’....” Amos 3:8 is cited. AR 471 · “...a lion roars when he sees His enemies and is assaulted by them, and when he sees his whelps and prey taken away; so does the Lord, comparatively, when He sees His church taken away from Him by devils. That this is what is signified by ‘roaring as a lion’....” Amos 3:8 is cited. AE278[7&8] · “...Jehovah is compared to a ‘roaring lion,’ because a ‘lion’ signifies power to lead forth from hell or from evils, and to ‘roar’ signifies defense against evils and falsities....” Amos 3:8 is cited. Derived Doctrine This section of the Word is clearly explained in the Writings, and there is no need to look for correspondences beyond what we are given. Let’s go directly to our summary section. Putting It All Together 1. The Lord laments when anyone purposely chooses to flee from His protection. The Lord laments when the hells attack a church. In other words, the Lord is not a passive observer of His children or His church. 2. He has given us the Word. He came so that He might fight and conquer the hells. All of this was not done without the Lord revealing it to His servants and prophets. His truth is serviceable and practical. These revelations and manifestations of Divine truth are “powerful” as told to us in AE 601[8]. The lion roaring is a spiritual roaring that puts fear into the heart of the hells. They surely know in their lucid moments that they cannot stand in the presence of the Lord. But sadly, their insanity causes them to imagine they can defeat the Lord. We, as readers of this prophecy, must take heart that we are cared for and loved by the Lord. He laments for each of us if anything of hell assaults us, and His truths, as servants, work to give us the wisdom of good to overcome and withstand the poison of falsity. 3. These two verses are a continuation of the previous seven questions. They highlight the good news of the Lord’s victory and help us to understand what is said in the P&P summary: “...the Lord will most surely reveal this....” Read and Review Read Amos 3:7-8. Read the summary in P&P. Questions to Stimulate Reflection 1. Have you noticed how often the prophecy of Amos portrays the Lord as a roaring Lion? Isn’t this a powerful image to add to our picture of the Lord? What other images of the Lord do we find in His Word? 2. The prophecy of Amos is more a statement of affirmativeness and that one of doom and gloom. In the spiritual sense, it is an announcement of the coming of the New Jerusalem. What parts of the prophecy so far seem to announce the coming of the New Jerusalem? 3. What explanation or understanding comes to you when the Writings say the Lord roars when He sees His church being taken away from Him by the devils? Can Hell really take the Lord’s church away from Him? 4. How much are we aware of all that the Lord does for us? How often does He act on our behalf? Does He let us help Him? If so, how? How much is done for us, and how much do we do as if from ourselves? 5. How many secrets do you think the Lord has given us? I’m not thinking of a specific number as much as a sense of appreciation for all that we have been given. Do we value them enough? What do we do to cherish this gift each day?
Passages From the Writings P&P · “...for thence it appears in what manner the church is being laid waste, vers. 9, 10...” Note: This is the only direct reference we have to these two verses. Once again, our ability to understand these verses falls on our ability to use derived doctrine. Derived Doctrine Palaces
Palaces of Ashdod
Palaces of Egypt
The Call to Assemble on the Mountains of Samaria
o signifies the spiritual church or the same perverted. (AC 1368[3]) o signifies the church which is in the affection of falsities or in affection of truth. (AC 2466[4]) o signifies those who are in external worship. (AC 10050[2])
Great Tumults in her Midst
Ignorance of the Difference between Right and Wrong
Storing Violence and Robbery in Their Palaces
Putting It All Together 1. The sacrament of Holy Supper offers a time for reflection. It is a time to look specifically at our lives and find an area of disorder that is blocks the light of heaven. When that specific disorder is seen, we need to make ourselves guilty of it. We are to confess that sin, as something for which we alone are responsible. Then we are to supplicate the Lord for His help in removing that disorder. When we do this work of repentance, there is a last step in the pursuit of our goal: A new life. We must live the change to make improvement. TCR 700[3] likens this most important sacrament to a river “containing scarcely visible grains of gold in great abundance; but when its holiness has been revealed, it is like the gold collected from the sand, melted into a mass, and wrought into beautiful forms.” We are to be sifters. We are to separate out the falsity of sand so that we can find the gold. That collected gold then needs to be put into some form that will honor the Lord. 2. Consequently, we are to look at contrasts. We are to desire spiritual palaces that contain the gifts of a spiritual life, palaces that will show us the difference between right and wrong. We need to find the discriminating prudence that comes from the Word. 3. The church of Israel stands forth here as a symbol of waste and dishonor. Implied in this contrast are some questions: “What is the health and vitality of your church like? Is your palace a place where violence and robbery are stored? Or is it place where order is found and a tumult is going on in the midst, so that evil is banished from a sanctuary dedicated to the worship of the Lord God Jesus Christ? Read and Review Read Amos 3:9-10. Read the summary from P&P. Questions to Stimulate Reflection 1. How successful are you at preparing for Holy Supper? Are you able to reflect on some specific thing you need help in overcoming so that Holy Supper is entered into worthily? 2. Do you slip into the general or vague request: “You know me, Lord. Remove whatever is most necessary.”? It appears from the Word that we need to be specific, own up to our mistakes, and not blame others for our conduct. Why do you think it is important to follow these steps? Why is it important to be specific? 3. How fair do we have to be to discriminate in matters of right and wrong? I’ve heard it said that the Lord wants us to make decisions. If we see that we have erred, He wants us to be willing to change. The mistake is to stubbornly hold to a wrong decision and refuse to change. What makes change hard in this context? 4. What is your view of this thing called self-esteem? Do we place this idea in its proper order of importance? What are some ways to keep a healthy perspective on self-esteem?
Passages From the Writings P&P · “...wherefore the truths of the church perish by falsities, ver. 11...” AC 2973[5&6] · “...when man does not suffer the Lord to dispose the things round about to correspondence, then he recedes from heaven in the measure in which he does not suffer it. That the soul of man is in the midst...and that the body is round about...is well known; for it is the body that encompasses and invests his soul or his spirit.... It is now plain what ‘round about’ means.” Amos 3:11 is cited as one of the references. Derived Doctrine An Adversary
Around the Land...
The Adversary Will Sap Strength and Plunder the Palaces
Putting It All Together 1. The Lord
alerts us to the fact that hell, our adversary, is all around the church.
Hell's goal is simple. It wants to separate us from the Lord. How it
accomplishes that goal is dependent on each person. Hell has a bag of
thousands of dirty tricks. It will try them all. It wants to sap our
strength. It wants to cause us to despair. It wants us to fight with one
another. Read and Review Read Amos 3:11. Read the summary from P&P. Questions to Stimulate Reflection 1. Our unit of study covered one verse. That one verse had no direct teachings for us to consider. We sought the help of derived doctrine. Did that study help us see the meaning? Was anything left out that needs clarification? 2. Do we agree with the Lord because we are scared of hell, or do we agree with Him from a “holy fear?” I’m sure many of you know the difference. If not, check out DP 136-139. 3. How can we best “suffer” ourselves to let the Lord dispose the things of order “round about” us? The “suffer” means “allow.” What does it mean when we “allow” the Lord, who is Omniscient, Omnipresent, and Omnipotent, to do something for us?
Passages From the Writings P&P · “...and the goods and truths of the Word will be taken away from them, ver. 12...” AC 3869[10&11] · “...‘to snatch the two legs’ denotes the will of good; and the ‘piece of an ear,’ the will of truth. That a ‘piece of an ear’ denotes this can as before said be seen solely from the correspondences in the other life, and the derivative significatives, according to which the internal sense of the Word, and also the rituals in the Israelitish and Jewish Church.... the obedience of faith is understood by ‘ears’ and obeying by ‘hearing’...” AC 6188[2] · “That a ‘bed’ denotes what is natural, is because the natural is beneath the rational, and serves it as a bed; for the rational as it were lies down upon the natural; and because the natural is thus spread out underneath, it is called a ‘bed’ as...in Amos iii.12....‘in the corner of a bed’ denotes in the lowest of the natural; and ‘on the end of a couch’ denotes in what is sensuous. For by the people Israel whose metropolis was Samaria, was represented the Lord’s spiritual kingdom.” AC 10050[1&2] · “...the signification of ‘legs’...the exterior things that belong to the natural man.... The like is signified by ‘legs’ in Amos....by ‘the lion’ are here signified those who lay waste the church; by ‘legs,’ the external of the church, which also is of the natural man; by ‘a piece of an ear,’ its perception; by ‘them that dwell in Samaria,’ those who are in external worship; ‘the corner of a bed and the extremity of a couch’ denote the lowest natural, which is the external sensuous, and its truth and good.” AR 137 · “Doctrine is also signified by ‘bed’ in Amos.... ‘In the corner of a bed,’ and ‘in the extremity of a couch,’ means what is more remote from the truths and goods of doctrine. ‘Bed’ and ‘couch’ and ‘bed chamber’ have a similar signification....” AE 163[3] · “‘Bed’ signifies the natural man, because the natural man underlies the spiritual, thus the spiritual lies on it and on the things that are in it as on its own bed.... In Amos...‘Lion’ signifies the church, here those therein that destroy goods and truths; ‘legs and a bit of an ear’ are the goods that are in the natural man, and something of perception of truth therefrom; ‘the sons of Israel that dwell in Samaria’ are those of the church; ‘on the corner of the bed, and on the end of the couch,’ are those in a little natural light from the spiritual, and in some truths therefrom.” Derived Doctrine Shepherd
Mouth
Putting It All Together 1. The summary of this verse has many threads to follow. I will attempt to follow one. You may be drawn to one of the other choices. 2. The children of Israel had made their bed, and they were lying in it. They chose the lowest quality of spiritual life. Their doctrine, their preaching, and their discourses were superficial and not very nourishing for the soul. The “beds” upon which their rational would rest kept them in a sensual squalor that was not befitting a church that was to represent the Lord and His Word to the world. 3. They were satisfied with squeezing religion in the corner and on the edge of the bed. Compare this attitude with the Advent lessons, when there was “no room in the inn” for the Lord to be born. They were so busy with their own agendas that they ignored the Lord’s plans for the church and failed to see the reality of their states. 4. Cramped and not restful, their souls had little (inferior) spiritual light. They hung on the edge of the bed (doctrine). The good of love and the good of wisdom, like two legs of a lamb, were in the mouth of the lion. The Lord as the Shepherd rescued what little good was left. He always preserves a remnant of a dying church so as to build a new one to serve as protector or repository for the living Word of the Lord. 5. The piece of the ear preserved is compellingly symbolic of the little obedience of faith the Israelites had left in them. A tattered, chewed on remnant of obedience. People only hear as well as they listen. Israel had ears that were heavy, and they were not listening well. Read and Review Read Amos 3:12. Read the summary from P&P. Questions to Stimulate Reflection 1. I wonder, as we go further into this study, how those who heard Amos understood this prophecy. The deeper levels of the correspondences have to be reviewed and remembered over and over. The Israelites were so wrapped up in their lies and superficiality that I don’t think they cared enough to pay attention. What do you think about this? 2. The image of the lion with the legs in its mouth and the piece of the ear being rescued is easy to keep in the mind’s eye. How can we best use this teaching for ourselves? 3. What about the bed as a resting place for the rational? Do we see this in a practical example? Is the crowded corner and sleeping on the edge of the bed something we can illustrate too? Do these things speak of our limited time of reading, reflecting on, and discussing doctrine each day? Our daily schedules seem to crowd out the spiritual and we know about this, but can we change our lifestyles? 4. We need to see these questions as a positive strengthening of spiritual priorities that are intended to improve the quality of our life, and not just negative weights laid on our busy, and somewhat confusing, time management decisions. What helps us see them as positive? Do we see positive outcomes when we address such questions?
Passages From the Writings P&P · In the previous verse, we read “...the goods and the truths of the Word will be taken away from them....” And now in verses 13-15, we are told: “...together with all things pertaining to the church, vers. 13-15.” AC 921[4] · “...‘altars’ denote idolatrous worship. In Amos iii. 14...‘altars’ denote representative worship became idolatrous.” AC 2832[10] · “In Amos...the ‘horns of the altar were to be cut off,’ was because truth from good was no longer represented there; ‘Bethel’ is the Divine Good, and is therefore called the ‘king’s sanctuary,’ and the ‘house of the kingdom’....” AC 10182[8] · “In Amos...by ‘the altars of Bethel,’ and by its ‘horns,’ are signified evils and falsities destroying the good and truth of the church, of which it is said that they ‘shall be cut off.’” Doctrine of the Lord 4 · The Doctrine of the Lord 4 has a reference to Amos 3:14. There are many passages cited whereby the word ‘that day,’ ‘in that day,’ and ‘in that time’...is meant the Lord’s advent.” AR 270 · “A horn...by it is everywhere (in the Word) signified power; therefore when a ‘horn’ is predicated of the Lord, it signifies omnipotence....that ‘a horn’ signifies power...may appear from the following passages...” Amos 3:14 is cited. AR 392 · In AR 392, Amos 3:14 is cited as one of representative examples of where there was worship “from evil and from the falsities of evil.” AE 316[20] · “In Amos...‘The altars of Bethel’ signify worship from evil, and ‘the horns of the altar’ signify the falsities of that evil; and that these are to be destroyed is signified by ‘the horns shall be cut off and fall to the earth.’” AE 391[29] · “In Amos...‘To visit the transgressions of Israel upon him’ signifies their last state, in the spiritual sense their state after death, when they are to be judged; it is said ‘to visit,’ instead of to judge, because visitation always proceeds judgment; ‘the altars of Bethel’ signify the worship from evil; ‘the horns of the altar’ signify worship from falsities, thus these signify all things of worship; and that these are to be destroyed is signified by ‘the horns shall be hewn down and fall to the earth.’ It is said, ‘I will visit upon the altars of Bethel,’ because Jeroboam separated the Israelites from the Jews, and erected two altars, one in Bethel and the other in Dan...” · This quote goes on for quite a bit more. One of the interesting points made in it is that these two altars represented a division and separation of worship from charity, and brought people to the state where “the mouth speaks apart from the understanding and the will, that is apart from the mind...they say men ought to believe even though they do not understand...(thus) they put aside deeds or goods of charity.” AC 1453[2&4] · “...for man is a Bethel, that is a house of God, and also a gate of heaven, when he is in the celestial things of knowledges.... After Jeroboam had profaned Bethel...it had an opposite representation....” AR 774 · “That ‘ivory’ signifies natural truth may be evident from the passages where ivory is mentioned, as...Amos iii. 15....” AE 1146[3] · “In (Amos) ‘Houses’ signify the things of the human mind, here the things of the natural mind separate from the spiritual mind; ‘winter house and summer house’ signify things of the natural man that are called sensual, and ‘house of ivory’ and ‘great house’ signify the things of the natural man that are called rational, ‘house of ivory’ here meaning those that have relation to truth, and ‘great house’ those that have relation to good.”
AR 595 · “By ‘horns’ is signified power...here the power of speaking, teaching, and writing, thus of reasoning and arguing.” Derived Doctrine This section of our study has a tremendous amount of information regarding Amos’ prophecy. There is so much that I will not seek to find any more because it might overwhelm us in the summation of these verses. I will proceed now to the summary section. Putting It All Together 1. When things go wrong, we often look for the cause. In this series, it would appear that it is important for us to start with the possible cause of things...King Jeroboam. AE 391[29] tells us that the Lord needed to visit (bring judgment) upon Israel because “Jeroboam separated the Israelites from the Jews, and erected two altars, one in Bethel and the other in Dan.” His motives brought about serious effects: · Bethel had represented a house of God and a gate to heaven. Bethel took on an opposite representation. · Their mouths (worship) separated the understanding and will. Doctrine was presented with a requirement to believe, even though they had no understanding of what it all meant. Therefore, their hearts left the worship, and closeness to the Lord was absent. · The horns of the altar signified power: the power of speaking, teaching, and writing, and thus reasoning and arguing. When the will and understanding were separated, these sources of power gradually diminished, and like a flickering light, they were about to go out. · Worship had no checks and balances. The people, like blind men, followed the teachings of their priesthood as long as it pleased them to do so. Therefore, falsity and idolatry entered the house of the Lord, profaning the very vessels of representation. · Every form of a spiritual house suffered. The winter house, the summer house, the ivory house and the great houses. The sensual, the rational and their relationship to the truth and good, were gone or destroyed. · No one cared. Their ruling love as represented by Jeroboam separated and perverted all of the arrangements and ordering of the tribes the Lord had seen to. The Lord’s ordering was so powerful Balaam could not pronounce a curse on Israel...only a blessing. 2. The Lord said that He would punish Israel for their transgressions. The punishment was not from anger but love. His love appears hard to the wicked, but it is full of mercy. The Lord had to cut off the “horns” of their altars. Their power of speaking lies, their power of teaching profanation and idolatry, their writing of foolishness, and their specious reasoning and arguments had to be cut off. 3. The house of God—the gate of heaven—was not available to the people, and the Lord needed to restore communication with the church. There could be no compromises or easing back into things. Like a cancer, their self-serving lies had to be removed completely before the contamination tainted all vital forms of spiritual love. Read and Review Read Amos 3:13-15. Read the summary from P&P. Questions to Stimulate Reflection 1. Have you formed your summary of these verses? It is important that we do this so that our ability to connect the series increases as we move on. 2. There are many other historical reasons why the nations divided. Bringing that into this section may be useful. What points might be added to strengthen this study? 3. The different houses show a fascinating progression. I wanted to check the signification of each a little deeper. Winter. Summer. Ivory. Great houses. Anyone willing to go further? What does each one mean? What might the progression mean? 4. What can we as New Church members take from this so we may protect ourselves from or avert the failings presented in this text?
|
|||